Build an auditable, node-level deliverability record for each MWh in your PPA portfolio. In the EU: designed to reduce double-allocation risk across fragmented registries. In the US: adds nodal deliverability evidence beyond RTO settlement.
Traders frequently sign dedicated-site PPAs (Power Purchase Agreements) but often lack internal systems robust enough to prevent the accidental or intentional selling of the same 100 MW plant output to multiple buyers.
Currently, the market relies on "Big 4" audit letters which are mere point-in-time snapshots, and balancing group data remains siloed within grid operators. This creates a structural buyer trust deficit that inhibits high-velocity trading.
Nameplate capacity registration using decentralized identifiers to anchor asset identity permanently.
Direct 15-minute HCS telemetry data ingestion, binding physical electron flow to the digital twin.
Hepta-V proprietary auditing proves the physical asset is active and synchronized to the reported telemetry.
Automated constraint logic ensures total minted tokens ≤ verified physical output at all times.
HTS-native atomic swaps reduce settlement risk. Protocol-layer constraints (node-hour issuance cap, PTDF-bounded allocation) are designed to make double allocation detectable ex-ante at the Guardian policy layer.
Evidence pack structured for third-party audit under ISAE 3000 or ISO 14065 against balancing-group and dispatch data.
Every certificate is anchored to an auditable deliverability inference. The protocol estimates physical deliverability at nodal level using Power Transfer Distribution Factors (PTDF) under network-flow physics, not individual electron tracking.
Corridor deliverability under binding constraints is a precondition for issuance. The evidence pack exposes the dispatch and PTDF inputs to independent review.
Comparative Matrix: Protocol Implementation vs. Legacy Standalone
| Requirement | Trader Standalone | Trader + DeliveryTag |
|---|---|---|
| Double-selling prevention | Soft Internal Controls | Hard Ledger Constraint |
| Real-time audit access | Manual (T+30 Days) | 15-min Instant Query |
| Physics-link verification | Theoretical Only | PTDF Path Mapping |
| Tokenization standard | Proprietary/Closed | Hedera HTS (Public) |
| Third-party assurance | Annual Audit Only | Continuous evidence pack |
| Balancing Group sync | Siloed Data | Multi-Source Reconciliation |
| Institutional Trust grade | Low (Bilateral) | High (Protocol-Grade) |
Our thesis: a neutral third-party protocol with a public-ledger anchor is a credible candidate for raising institutional trust in high-value PPA transactions. Adoption and acceptance will be determined by buyers, auditors, and regulators case by case.
Real-time binding of physical telemetry to non-fungible energy assets.
Congestion-aware certificate minting logic (PTDF-gate).
We operate under FRAND Licensing terms to ensure global interoperability while protecting our exclusive supplier contracts and flex-load partnerships.
The methodology is designed for US RTOs with real-time nodal data and European markets via ENTSO-E and JAO flow-based parameters. Data coverage is pilot-ready in selected markets.
ERCOT · PJM · MISO · CAISO · SPP · NYISO
Real-time nodal PTDF + LMP data
ENTSO-E · JAO · National Grid ESO
Day-ahead zonal + ex-post settlement data
B200 GPU + TFT++ predictive PTDF
Congestion forecasting 24-48h ahead
Hyperscaler 24/7 CFE + RE100 buyers
Corporates with public commitments to hourly matched clean electricity
The PPA integrity problem exists in both EU and US markets, but manifests differently.
Fragmented registries enable cross-border gaming
24+ national GO registries (UBA, Powernext, CNMC, GSE, Ofgem) with limited cross-registry verification
AIB Hub cross-border transfers create opacity, a GO bought in Spain can be sold in Germany
Bidding zones hide internal congestion, no nodal visibility within zones
Trader can over-allocate the same generation to multiple PPAs across registries
DeliveryTag addresses: Atomic HTS tokens are designed to reduce cross-registry double-allocation risk. Continuous on-chain evidence supports, rather than replaces, periodic third-party attestation. Hedera anchoring is registry-independent.
The RTO settles energy. DeliveryTag adds node-level deliverability evidence.
Double-selling is not the US problem. RTOs (PJM, ERCOT, MISO) handle energy settlements directly, the RTO knows who generated what, when, and how much. PPA double-selling is structurally prevented by the settlement process.
What the RTO cannot prove:
Physical delivery during congestion: the RTO settles energy financially, but when the corridor is congested, clean MWh may be curtailed before reaching the buyer's node. The settlement says "matched," the grid says "curtailed."
Nodal delivery attribution: which marginal generator was actually displaced at the buyer's node? The RTO publishes LMPs but not per-buyer delivery proofs.
24/7 CFE credibility gap: a hyperscaler campus can match hourly via RECs, but auditors and regulators increasingly want audit-grade evidence of where the clean electrons were delivered.
DeliveryTag for US: Mode A evidences that a physical path exists when the corridor is clear. Mode B evidences that flex loads freed the corridor when it was congested. Together: hour-by-hour audit-grade evidence that complements RTO settlement.
EU: designed to reduce double-allocation risk across fragmented registries. US: adds auditable nodal deliverability evidence beyond RTO settlement.
A snapshot of what DeliveryTag returns under representative grid conditions.
Impact